πŸ“‹ Case Study

Case IH Axial-Flow 140 Combine β€” SCR Ammonia Slip During High-Load Harvesting

Ammonia slip > 25 ppm triggering fault code SPN 4334, causing derate and reduced throughput

πŸ—οΈ Project Overview

High-yield corn harvest in Iowa under 95Β°F ambient conditions

🎯 Challenge

Ammonia slip > 25 ppm triggering fault code SPN 4334, causing derate and reduced throughput

πŸ”§ Design Approach

Urea injector pulse-width optimization + dual-point NOx sensor recalibration + exhaust residence time modeling

πŸ“ Design Diagram

Case IH Axial-Flow 140 β€” SCR Ammonia Slip Mitigation Exhaust In Urea Injector Pulse-width optimized SCR Reactor Ο„ = 0.42 s @ 220Β°C NOxin NOxout Dual-point recalibration Exhaust Out Ammonia Slip AS = 28.6 ppm (k Γ— (Urea_Dose βˆ’ 1.2Γ—NOx_Load)) SPN 4334 AS > 25 ppm Exhaust flow Urea injection NOx sensing

AI-generated project design illustration

πŸ“ Key Calculations

Residence Time at 220Β°C

Ο„ = V_reactor / Q_exh
Result: 0.42 sec
Below minimum 0.5 sec required for full hydrolysis

Ammonia Slip Prediction

AS = k Γ— (Urea_Dose βˆ’ 1.2 Γ— NOx_Load)
Result: 28.6 ppm
Validated root cause as overdosing

πŸ“Š Results

Ammonia slip reduced to < 5 ppm; no derates observed across 3-week harvest window

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • β€’Urea dosing maps must be load- and temperature-compensatedβ€”not just speed-based
  • β€’Single-point NOx sensor calibration is insufficient for SCR tuning

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Urea dosing maps must be load- and temperature-compensatedβ€”not just speed-based
  • 2Single-point NOx sensor calibration is insufficient for SCR tuning