πŸ“‹ Case Study

Australian Bulk Wheat Terminal Pneumatic Line Blockage Elimination

Intermittent dense-phase blockages near 3rd booster station causing 2–4 hr delays

πŸ—οΈ Project Overview

Port of Brisbane export terminal handling 5.7M tons/year wheat via 12 km pneumatic line

🎯 Challenge

Intermittent dense-phase blockages near 3rd booster station causing 2–4 hr delays

πŸ”§ Design Approach

Installed inline pressure gradient sensors + adaptive air injection valves; recalibrated minimum transport velocity using DEM-simulated particle drag coefficients

πŸ“ Design Diagram

Bulk Wheat Pneumatic Line Layout1st BS2nd BS3rd BS4th BSBlockage ZoneΞ”P/L > 2.1 kPa/mAdaptive Air ValveU_min = 11.2 m/sDense-Phase Transport ZoneInletOutletDEM-Calibrated Drag Coefficients(Οβ‚š=1200 kg/mΒ³, dβ‚š=0.8 mm)

AI-generated project design illustration

πŸ“ Key Calculations

Minimum Transport Velocity

U_min = 0.125 Γ— d_p^0.33 Γ— √(g Γ— d_p Γ— (ρ_pβˆ’Ο_a)/ρ_a)
Result: 11.2 m/s
Below this, saltation-to-dune transition occurs

Pressure Gradient Spike Threshold

Ξ”P/L > 1.8 kPa/m
Result: 2.1 kPa/m
Indicates incipient dune formation

πŸ“Š Results

Zero blockages over 14 months; line availability increased from 82% to 99.1%; energy use reduced 19%

πŸ’‘ Lessons Learned

  • β€’Fixed velocity setpoints fail under seasonal moisture shifts
  • β€’Pressure gradient slopeβ€”not absolute valueβ€”is the true early-warning signal

βœ… Key Takeaways

  • 1Fixed velocity setpoints fail under seasonal moisture shifts
  • 2Pressure gradient slopeβ€”not absolute valueβ€”is the true early-warning signal